{"id":25859,"date":"2026-02-22T01:58:07","date_gmt":"2026-02-22T01:58:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/?p=25859"},"modified":"2026-02-22T01:58:07","modified_gmt":"2026-02-22T01:58:07","slug":"supreme-court-nixes-trumps-tariffs-in-blow-to-president","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/?p=25859","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Nixes Trump\u2019s Tariffs in Blow to President"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
SOME CARD INFO MAY BE OUTDATED <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThis page includes information about these cards, currently unavailable on
\n SS. The information has been collected by SS and has not
\n been provided or reviewed by the card issuer.\n<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled that the basis of President Donald Trump\u2019s justification for enacting most of his second-term tariffs is unconstitutional. <\/span><\/div>\n

The ruling means the U.S. may owe businesses many billions of dollars in refunds. It also means that consumers could eventually see lower prices than they have since the reciprocal tariffs began. <\/span><\/p>\n

But the SCOTUS ruling doesn\u2019t mean the end of tariffs altogether \u2014 Trump\u2019s tariffs on steel and aluminum, for example, would stand. And the president can certainly impose more tariffs, but he\u2019ll have to find a different channel to do so. <\/span><\/p>\n

In 2025, Trump unilaterally imposed a sweeping set of what he called \u201creciprocal\u201d tariffs on imports from countries worldwide. The administration justified his action under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law that allows the executive branch to regulate certain economic transactions during declared national emergencies tied to an \u201cunusual and extraordinary\u201d threat to national security or the economy. <\/span><\/div>\n

Trump says the tariffs are meant to counter what he describes as unfair trade practices and to pressure trading partners into negotiating more favorable terms for the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Meet MoneyNerd, your weekly news decoder<\/h3>\n

So much news. So little time. SS’s new weekly newsletter makes sense of the headlines that affect your wallet.
<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span> SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE <\/a> <\/div>\n

<\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Several private companies and 12 states challenged the reciprocal tariffs in a series of lawsuits, arguing that IEEPA did not give the president authority to enact the tariffs and that this type of sweeping trade policy requires congressional authorization. <\/span><\/p>\n

Federal district courts ruled in favor of the challengers, stating that the president did not have the authority to impose tariffs under the IEEPA and that Congress historically maintains control over broad tariff policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Trump administration appealed those rulings, arguing that the IEEPA gives the president discretion to respond to economic threats. <\/span><\/p>\n

On Nov. 5, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Learning Resources v. Trump<\/span>, a case consolidating the key questions in the lower-court cases. During arguments, several justices appeared skeptical of the administration\u2019s use of IEEPA as justification for imposing large-scale tariffs.<\/span><\/p>\n

On Feb. 20, SCOTUS agreed 6-3 that the administration could not enact tariffs under the IEEPA.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe President asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope,\u201d wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion. \u201cIn light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Roberts said IEEPA cannot be used as justification because the IEEPA contains no reference to tariffs or duties, there is no statute in which Congress gives the president power to \u201cregulate\u201d imports and no president has used IEEPA to impose tariffs. <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

What does the tariff ruling mean for you? <\/h2>\n<\/div>\n

The court\u2019s ruling means the tariffs enacted under the IEEPA \u2014 the majority of Trump\u2019s second-term tariffs \u2014 are null and void. <\/span><\/p>\n

Without tariffs, importers\u2019 costs will fall, which means the cost of doing business will go down. As a result, consumer prices are likely to eventually ease, meaning everyday imports like electronics and appliances, apparel, auto parts and furniture could get cheaper. That dynamic is also likely to ease tariff-fueled inflation. <\/span><\/p>\n

Without tariffs, shipping products internationally will likely be faster, and importers won\u2019t have to rely on supply-chain workarounds. Not only will overseas purchases arrive faster, but there will also likely be more options on store shelves. <\/span><\/p>\n

However, it will take time for prices to come down as importers work through inventories purchased under tariff conditions and wait for contracts with suppliers or shippers to unwind. In other words, consumers probably won\u2019t see price drops overnight. <\/span><\/p>\n

There\u2019s another wrinkle, too: Some companies may not lower prices and instead absorb the savings from the absence of tariffs as profit. <\/span><\/p>\n

Importers expect to be refunded <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Importers will no longer have to pay tariffs going forward and with tariffs struck down, importers are expected to receive refunds on levies paid while the tariffs were in place. What\u2019s unclear at the moment is how businesses will recoup that tariff money and the timeline for doing so. Administering the process could take years. <\/span><\/p>\n

Some companies have already sold their rights to any future refund money they might receive under the ruling, which allowed them to get cash immediately instead of waiting for a refund later. Investors, banking on tariffs being overturned, paid only a small fraction up front and reserved the rights to the eventual refunds.<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump will likely seek other ways to impose tariffs <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

It\u2019s likely the Trump administration won\u2019t give up on tariffs. Trump has other potential avenues to enact levies on imports without Congress including:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n