{"id":17313,"date":"2025-06-26T19:00:25","date_gmt":"2025-06-26T19:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/?p=17313"},"modified":"2025-06-26T19:00:25","modified_gmt":"2025-06-26T19:00:25","slug":"what-the-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-crypto-order-really-means","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/?p=17313","title":{"rendered":"What the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Crypto Order Really Means"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

There\u2019s been a lot of hubbub about crypto-backed mortgages in the past 24 hours.<\/p>\n

But the excitement (of crypto enthusiasts) might be a little overdone. It\u2019s time to explain.<\/p>\n

When it comes down to it, all that happened was FHFA Director Bill Pulte ordered Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to \u201cconsider cryptocurrency\u201d in their risk assessments.<\/p>\n

And to allow so-called HODLers to qualify for a mortgage without actually having to sell their crypto holdings.<\/p>\n

In other words, it\u2019s only a starting point in the discussion and it\u2019s not really a crypto-backed mortgage.<\/p>\n

Current Mortgage Guidelines Require Virtual Currency to Be Sold First If Used for Qualifying<\/h2>\n

First a quick background on the matter. As it stands now, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac require mortgage loan applicants to sell any virtual currency they wish to use for qualifying purposes.<\/p>\n

For example, if you have $100,000 in bitcoin holdings, and want to use it for the down payment, closing costs, or for asset reserves, it must be sold into U.S. dollars in order to be counted.<\/p>\n

At that point, it\u2019s considered \u201cacceptable for the down payment, closing costs, and financial reserves,\u201d per Fannie Mae guideline B3-4.1-04<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Specifically, this means providing documented evidence that the virtual currency you\u2019d like to pledge toward the mortgage has been exchanged into U.S. dollars and is then held in a U.S. or state regulated financial institution.<\/p>\n

In addition, the funds must be verified to be in U.S. dollars prior to the loan closing.<\/p>\n

Also, any large deposits must be documented to ensure the funds came from the borrower\u2019s virtual currency account (and not somewhere else).<\/p>\n

This is similar to other assets used for qualifying purposes, though the rules are a bit harsher when it comes to crypto, ostensibly because it\u2019s still kind of uncharted territory.<\/p>\n

Yes, it has become a lot more mainstream in the past couple years, which is probably why this new directive exists to begin with.<\/p>\n

But let\u2019s consider the treatment of stocks and mutual funds.<\/p>\n

If you want to use your stock, bond, or mutual fund holdings to qualify for a mortgage, you can do so and \u201cno documentation of the borrower\u2019s actual receipt of funds realized from the sale or liquidation is required.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, the value of the asset (as determined by B3-4.3-01<\/a>) must be at least 20% more than the amount of funds needed for the down payment and\/or the closing costs.<\/p>\n

So you need a sizable buffer in order to HODL your stocks and bonds.<\/p>\n

But if you don\u2019t have that 20% buffer, evidence is required showing that the borrower sold or liquidated their position, and it must be documented.<\/p>\n

In this case, it\u2019s basically the same as the guidelines for cryptocurrency.<\/p>\n

What Did Pulte Actually Say About Mortgages and Cryptocurrency?<\/h2>\n

In his order, Pulte said<\/a>, \u201cCryptocurrency is an emerging asset class that may offer an opportunity to build wealth outside of the stock and bond markets.\u201d<\/p>\n

Adding that, \u201ccryptocurrency has not typically been considered in the mortgage risk assessment process for mortgage loans delivered to the Enterprises, without converting the cryptocurrency to U.S. dollars prior to loan closing.\u201d<\/p>\n

Finally, he states, \u201cEach Enterprise is directed to consider only cryptocurrency assets that can be evidenced and stored on a U.S.-regulated centralized exchange subject to all applicable laws.\u201d<\/p>\n

There\u2019s also a note about considering \u201cadditional risk mitigants\u201d such as adjustments for market volatility as cryptocurrency is newer and might require wider guardrails.<\/p>\n

How that might look is instead of a 20% buffer, you might need a 30% or 40% buffer to HODL and use the assets for mortgage qualifying purposes.<\/p>\n

The most important detail here is there isn\u2019t some new Wild West mortgage underwriting being unveiled.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s actually pretty boring and everything will need to be documented, similar to stocks, bonds, etc.<\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t a return to 2006 underwriting standards, despite the many memes that have popped up overnight making it appear that way.<\/p>\n

The joke du jour is you can now use Fartcoin holdings to qualify for a mortgage. I get it, it\u2019s funny, no problem there.<\/p>\n

But it\u2019s important to clarify that any crypto must currently be liquidated to U.S. dollars, at which point it\u2019s a very real asset, even if it was previously Fartcoin. That doesn\u2019t really matter, does it?<\/p>\n

And if this directive does eventually amount to changes, you\u2019ll likely still need a big buffer to use any crypto for down payment, closing costs, or reserves.<\/p>\n

So a lot of checks and balances will remain in place either way. Importantly, Pulte\u2019s order says any changes should \u201cfacilitate sustainable homeownership to creditworthy borrowers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read on:<\/span> Can you use bitcoin to pay the mortgage?<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"Colin<\/div>\n
\n

Before creating this site, I worked as an account executive for a wholesale mortgage lender in Los Angeles. My hands-on experience in the early 2000s inspired me to begin writing about mortgages 19 years ago to help prospective (and existing) home buyers better navigate the home loan process. Follow me on X for hot takes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n
\"Colin<\/div>\n
\n
Latest posts by Colin Robertson (see all)<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n