{"id":17276,"date":"2025-06-25T23:51:17","date_gmt":"2025-06-25T23:51:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/?p=17276"},"modified":"2025-06-25T23:51:17","modified_gmt":"2025-06-25T23:51:17","slug":"tpc-finds-the-senates-tax-cut-mostly-favors-high-income-households","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/?p=17276","title":{"rendered":"TPC Finds The Senate\u2019s Tax Cut Mostly Favors High-Income Households"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div>\n<figure class=\"embed-base image-embed embed-0\" role=\"presentation\">\n<div style=\"padding-top:66.67%;position:relative\" class=\"image-embed__placeholder\"><img alt=\"Congress Returns To Work On Capitol Hill After Weekend\" data-height=\"2088\" data-width=\"3131\" style=\"position:absolute;top:0\"><\/div><figcaption><fbs-accordion classname=\"expandable\" current=\"-1\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"color-body light-text\" role=\"button\">WASHINGTON, DC &#8211; JUNE 23: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) speaks to reporters after leaving <span class=\"plus\" data-ga-track=\"caption expand\">&#8230; More<\/span><span class=\"expanded-caption\"> the Senate Chambers in the U.S. Capitol. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski\/Getty Images)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/fbs-accordion><small>Getty Images<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The tax provisions of the Senate Finance Committee\u2019s draft budget bill would cut household taxes by an average of about $2,600 in 2026, slightly less than the House-passed bill, according to a new Tax Policy Center analysis.<\/p>\n<p>About 83% of households would have their taxes cut, compared to what they\u2019d pay if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expired as scheduled at the end of this year. However, like <a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/taxvox\/tpc-finds-final-house-budget-bill-cuts-average-taxes-2900-mostly-high-income-households\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/taxvox\/tpc-finds-final-house-budget-bill-cuts-average-taxes-2900-mostly-high-income-households\" aria-label=\"its House counterpart\">its House counterpart<\/a>, the bill would target most of its benefits to higher-income households.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.finance.senate.gov\/imo\/media\/doc\/finance_committee_section-by-section_title_vii3.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.finance.senate.gov\/imo\/media\/doc\/finance_committee_section-by-section_title_vii3.pdf\" aria-label=\"Senate Finance Committee bill\">Senate Finance Committee bill<\/a> makes scores of changes to the House version. In addition, it is likely to be revised before the chamber votes on the measure. Among the changes: Some increase in the cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which would provide additional benefits to high-income households. TPC\u2019s analysis does not include the bill\u2019s changes to Medicaid and Medicare.<\/p>\n<h2>Who Gets The Benefits?<\/h2>\n<p>The highest-income 20% of households\u2014those making $217,000 or more\u2014 would receive about 57% of the benefit of the Senate tax cuts, while the top 5%, who make $460,000 and up, would get more than one-third.<\/p>\n<p>By contrast, the lowest-income 20% of households, who make about $35,000 or less, would get about 1.5% of the benefit and middle-income households would receive about 14%.<\/p>\n<p>On average, those low-income households would pay about $150 less than under current law, and their after-tax income would increase by less than 1%. Middle-income households would pay $1,750 less on average, about 2.2% of their after-tax income.<\/p>\n<p>High-income households would receive much more generous tax benefits. For example, the bill would reduce taxes for those making between about $460,000 and $1.1 million (the 95th<sup> <\/sup>to 99th income percentile) by about $18,000 or 3.8% of their after-tax income.<\/p>\n<p>As a share of after-tax income, that group would make out best. For example, the highest-income one percent of households would see their taxes cut by about $67,000 on average, or 3.1% of their after-tax income.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"embed-base image-embed embed-1\" role=\"presentation\"><figcaption><fbs-accordion><\/p>\n<p class=\"color-body light-text\" role=\"button\">TPC&#8217;s analysis of the Senate Finance Committee&#8217; version of the OBBBA<\/p>\n<p><\/fbs-accordion><small>Tax Policy Center<\/small><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>How The Bills Differ<\/h2>\n<p>Among the biggest differences:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The <a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/model-estimates\/T25-0196\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/model-estimates\/T25-0196\" aria-label=\"House would raise the cap on the SALT deduction\">House would raise the cap on the SALT deduction<\/a> from $10,000 to $40,000. This version of the Senate Finance bill would leave it at $10,000, though that is almost certain to change.<\/li>\n<li>The House would toughen the individual <a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/model-estimates\/t25-0051-characteristics-alternative-minimum-tax-amt-payers-2024-26-and-2035\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/model-estimates\/t25-0051-characteristics-alternative-minimum-tax-amt-payers-2024-26-and-2035\" aria-label=\"Alternative Minimum Tax\">Alternative Minimum Tax<\/a>, hitting more than 4 million households. The Senate measure would make only minor changes to the AMT.<\/li>\n<li>The House version of President Donald Trump\u2019s campaign promises, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/taxvox\/heres-tip-no-taxes-tips-may-be-good-politics-bad-policy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/taxvox\/heres-tip-no-taxes-tips-may-be-good-politics-bad-policy\" aria-label=\"no taxes on tips\">no taxes on tips<\/a> and overtime or tax-exempt interest on auto loans, would be more generous than the Senate\u2019s. One exception: The Senate creates a special $6,000 deduction for older adults while the House version provides a $4,000 deduction. Trump had proposed exempting Social Security benefits from tax.<\/li>\n<li>The Senate measure would include more generous corporate tax breaks, which TPC distributes to households.<\/li>\n<li>The House would increase <a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/briefing-book\/what-child-tax-credit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/briefing-book\/what-child-tax-credit\" aria-label=\"the Child Tax Credit\">the Child Tax Credit<\/a> in the short term by somewhat more than the Senate version, but the Senate would make its changes permanent and index the credit for inflation. The House\u2019s credit bump would be temporary and not inflation-adjusted.<\/li>\n<li>The House would increase the <a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/briefing-book\/how-are-pass-through-businesses-taxed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/briefing-book\/how-are-pass-through-businesses-taxed\" aria-label=\"special tax deduction for some closely-held businesses\">special tax deduction for some closely-held businesses<\/a> from 20% to 23%. The Senate would keep the rate unchanged, though it would make other revisions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Despite these and many smaller changes, both bills would extend the TCJA and include some version of Trump\u2019s campaign tax proposals. As a result, the distributional differences between the House and Senate Finance bills are modest. However, they are noticeable.<\/p>\n<h2>Comparing The Tax Changes<\/h2>\n<p>Overall, the Senate Finance bill would cut taxes by an average of $2,600 while the <a href=\"https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/model-estimates\/T25-0187\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/taxpolicycenter.org\/model-estimates\/T25-0187\" aria-label=\"House bill would reduce them by about $2,900\">House bill would reduce them by about $2,900<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Among lower-income households the differences are very small in 2026. Their average tax cut would be $150 in the Senate bill compared to $160 in the House version. Similarly, middle-income households would pay an average of $1,750 less under the Senate bill compared to $1,850 in the House version.<\/p>\n<p>The differences would be more noticeable for higher-income households. For example, the Senate bill would cut taxes by an average of about $18,000 for the $460,000 to $1.1 million income group while the House bill would reduce their tax bills by an average of nearly $21,000. Among the reasons: the absence of SALT relief and the lower deduction for pass-through businesses in the Senate bill.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, the House bill would cut taxes for the top 0.1%, those making $5.2 million or more, by an average of $50,000 more than the Senate Finance bill.<\/p>\n<p>The other major difference between the two bills is that they are built on two very different budget baselines. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jct.gov\/publications\/2025\/jcx-29-25\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.jct.gov\/publications\/2025\/jcx-29-25\/\" aria-label=\"The Senate bill cuts taxes by only about $440 billion\">The Senate bill cuts taxes by only about $440 billion<\/a> over 10 years by assuming there is no cost to extending the TCJA.<\/p>\n<p>However, assuming the TCJA expires as scheduled and the Treasury must pay for any tax cuts beyond 2025, the Senate Finance bill would <a href=\"https:\/\/www.finance.senate.gov\/imo\/media\/doc\/jct_current_law_baseline_score_of_republican_tax_planpdf.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.finance.senate.gov\/imo\/media\/doc\/jct_current_law_baseline_score_of_republican_tax_planpdf.pdf\" aria-label=\"reduce revenues by $4.2 trillion\">reduce revenues by $4.2 trillion<\/a> over the same period. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jct.gov\/publications\/2025\/jcx-26-25r\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" data-ga-track=\"ExternalLink:https:\/\/www.jct.gov\/publications\/2025\/jcx-26-25r\/\" aria-label=\"The House bill would cost $3.8 trillion.\">The House bill would cost $3.8 trillion.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>That and many of the substantive differences between the two bills must be resolved before the giant tax and spending measure reaches Trump\u2019s desk. That leaves a lot to do between now and the GOP\u2019s self-imposed deadline of July 4.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/howardgleckman\/2025\/06\/25\/tpc-finds-the-senates-tax-cut-mostly-favors-high-income-households\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WASHINGTON, DC &#8211; JUNE 23: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) speaks to reporters after leaving &#8230; More the Senate Chambers in the U.S. Capitol. (Photo by Kayla Bartkowski\/Getty Images) Getty Images The tax provisions of the Senate Finance Committee\u2019s draft budget bill would cut household taxes by an average of about $2,600 in 2026,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17277,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[196],"tags":[419,5864,1801,6170,1210,7022,97,5469],"class_list":{"0":"post-17276","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-finance-news","8":"tag-cut","9":"tag-favors","10":"tag-finds","11":"tag-highincome","12":"tag-households","13":"tag-senates","14":"tag-tax","15":"tag-tpc"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17276"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17276\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/17277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/finderica.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}